Would the AFL best a better comp with:
14 teams playing the other 13 teams twice, once at each others home deck for a 26 week home and away season?
Each of the 14 clubs having a reserves team that travelled with them?
A rebranding of the award medals that would incorporate a vfl star, a snafl star and a wafl star?
Barrasi (vfl)for Brownlow,
Farmer (snafl - kicked 1450 goals for North Adelaide)for Coleman,
Cable (Wafl - Big game player i think 5 or 6 Simpsons)for Norm Smith,
198 games v 182 games, TRY selling that to foxtel and Channel 7
it would eradicate at least 20 games that no one will watch so what is the point in having no contests as opposed to the majority of games being well fought out, quality v quantity. Hats off to T.F a F
UNKA2 your mathamatics is correct.
However tell foxtell and seven that all games will be competitive and with large supporter bases and with no blow outs and the price will be increased.
God you too have very similar names.
UNKA2 your mathamatics is correct.
However tell foxtell and seven that all games will be competitive and with large supporter bases and with no blow outs and the price will be increased.
[/quote]
Are you a embicile, you’ve pushed this wheel barrow on every chat forum it aint going to happen, you will be pushing up daisy’s before they reduce any Melbourne teams.
TFAF I hope your English teacher is not still teaching kids. You’ve got too much time on your hands. Go back to school.
the players will be keen for that, it will mean they get paid less..
next suggestion..
It is never going to happen.The competition will get bigger,something like 20 teams,before your suggestion even gets a look in.
We all know for the sake of better football that less makes more.But there will not be a lessening of teams out of Melbourne as long as your A/hole points to the ground.
Still it must have been a real good dream you had.Pity you have to wake up some time.