I wonder if Peel put Pav on their playing list on Saturday, against Perth, so that he can qualify for the WAFL finals.
Why not…they do it with other players… why stop!
Hey Jimmy
Nothing would surprise me with Peel this year with there carry on.I recon Pav would tell them where to go.
Like your work Jimmy.
But I think even this one is a bit of a stretch. :silly:
Like your work Jimmy.
But I think even this one is a bit of a stretch. :silly:
[/quote]
If u check yesterday’s budget apparently Fyfe needs to play 5 matches to qualify to play for “Peel” in the finals. What a joke.
No different to the injured Logue walking out for the SD colts game and then walking off without dirtying his boots, all in aid for SD colts qualification for the finals…christ it is only colts footy…desperate times require desperate measures I guess
Freezin pleas explain what Logue did during the colts’ game and why wasn’t he playing league yesterday?
Read The West mate…Logue was listed in the SD colts starting 22 apparently…walked on the oval and then walked straight off…qualified him for SD colts finals campaign…no different to Balic at Peel…hopefully not true but quite surprised SD would do it…especially with their record of development…lost the game to EF inthe latter part of the game…playing one short on purpose is not showing the opposition and the comp much respect I reckon…but hey can understand why Peel and SD are doing it though
To put it mildly Freezin what a load of crap to try to compare what supposedly happened with Logue and the Peel situation. You have absolutely no idea why Logue did not play in our league team on Saturday.
Griffen Logue should be playing (and has earned every fragment of that right to do such) Colts footy purely given his age - that he has been promoted to league speaks volumes of the work he has undertaken
Swans have every right to allow the lad a chance of some silverware to send him off the VFL abattoir
That Fremantle fraud has no right & has earnt nothing in this WANFL competition
Gotta pull you up Swan.
Give us an idea of really happened with Logue then.
Why was he was listed to play Colts,didn’t play,leaving you one short,losing,meaning you’re likely to play from the Elimination Final stage.
He was supposed to play League instead was he?
What Peel and Fremantle did was a joke.Please us Swans didn’t follow suit?
Enlighten us.
Got no probs with Logue getting qualified…just ironic and funny that 3 SD fans are on here moaning on what Peel are doing, yet their own club has played a game intentionally one short to get a player qualified…
more than happy to be proved wrong, but unless you 42 or anyone else in the know at SDFC can put a clearer slant on it…one has to assume what SD did… surely is no different in principle to what Peel has done with Balic?..
It’s wrong if that’s the case and the Rule(and or Loophole)should be revoked immediately.
Haven’t seen what Peel’s CEO John Ditchburn has said,but Balic was listed(number 24) and did not play for Peel’s Reserves.
FARCICAL!
Swans should not do the same with Logue!Wouldn’t want another Rod Browne on their hands again would they?Their Colts get past us in these circumstances,especially at the business end of the season,I’ll throw in the protest flag.
There is a huge difference in this case - Logue had already played 4 previous Colts fixtures before being promoted to senior footy , and is still by his age naturally able to help Swans win the colts flag
This VFL ring-in is another dirty trick
Fair dinkum Freeze is making a complete and utter goose of himself yet again on a SD matter!
Can you tell us all here if Logue actually took the field for Swans Colts Frosty or maybe you will have to ask your eyes at the game Strono?
He wasnt 100% hence why he couldnt/didnt play League and tried but ultimately failed to get through a Colts game.
If we did that for the next 5 games in a row (even tho Balic doesnt even suit up let alone take the field and hasnt once all year let alone played 5 League, 1 Reserves, 5 Colts & 5 WA 18s games) then it would be similar to what is happening at FART!
Come on freeze you’re acting like you’re surprised at the dodgy tactics used by SDFC. They’ve been employing a win at all costs no matter what the rules for the past 10 years. If they’re not breaking rules they’re finding loop holes and have the cheek to accuse subiaco of exploiting loopholes.
yes, this is an important issue - hopefully there is a full investigation.
It is a obviously a massive issue over in NZ to Freeze MO even more so than asking why his very own club are THE ONLY CLUB not too promote any of their State 18s to the senior grades as yet …maybe they are more intent on making Colts finals than developing their better youngsters?! :whistle:
surely he would have known that Swans played 3 state 18’s players in the reserves on Saturday and weakened their colts to help the development of these kids by playing senior footy ?
he is across everything else at SD so i am sure he has a handle on what we are doing with developing our youngsters this year.
be nice if he actually spoke about EF for a change but we know that wont happen.
Gotta pull you up Swan.
Give us an idea of really happened with Logue then.
Why was he was listed to play Colts,didn’t play,leaving you one short,losing,meaning you’re likely to play from the Elimination Final stage.
He was supposed to play League instead was he?
What Peel and Fremantle did was a joke.Please us Swans didn’t follow suit?
Enlighten us.
[/quote]
Grassy not being coy but Freezin seems to know everything about everything he can clarify the circumstances.
Come on freeze you’re acting like you’re surprised at the dodgy tactics used by SDFC. They’ve been employing a win at all costs no matter what the rules for the past 10 years. If they’re not breaking rules they’re finding loop holes and have the cheek to accuse subiaco of exploiting loopholes.
[/quote]
TOSG to put it perfectly clearly and succinctly go back to the Swans’ topic creted for your inane comments. When you explain ho you could fit Robinson in your salary and points cap in February then we may take some notice of your inane and puerile comments.