2013 WAFL Round 4 Wrap

Why do you think ,they are good?,If you do your the sad one.

Iwhy do you bother posting them if you don’t expect comments, or are posters only allowed to post comments agreeable to you.?
[/quote]

You only post/troll about one thing…how effing crap everything is.
Last week when they were good figures, you claimed that they must be fake. This week, they’re poor, so according to you the figures are only accurate this week.

It’s sad to see a person who claims to support the comp, actually hoping to see things fail just so they can be proven right.
[/quote]

Ok well in future just to keep you happy if i see spade Ill call it a rake. …

LH I attended both the Friday night game & obviously the game at Basso on Saturday & I can assure you those attendance figures are way out for both games ..there were easily over 2000 at Basso on Saturday & close to 2000 at Freo on the Friday not the 1400 that has been given as “official”!!
[/quote]

They did update the Freo figure to 1960, which I updated a little later in the day once I saw it changed.

The Basso figure does look small considering how many usually turn up for a Swans home game.

Maybe they put $5000 in a brown paper bag mate. :lol: The old ploy - say there’s 1596 instead of 2096 and nobody will be the wiser. Every cent helps.

Truth is, I don’t know if some clubs really do that but it was imparted to me from a private source that it may have happened in the past. Particularly at one club.

LH I attended both the Friday night game & obviously the game at Basso on Saturday & I can assure you those attendance figures are way out for both games ..there were easily over 2000 at Basso on Saturday & close to 2000 at Freo on the Friday not the 1400 that has been given as “official”!!
[/quote]

They did update the Freo figure to 1960, which I updated a little later in the day once I saw it changed.

The Basso figure does look small considering how many usually turn up for a Swans home game.

Maybe they put $5000 in a brown paper bag mate. :lol: The old ploy - say there’s 1596 instead of 2096 and nobody will be the wiser. Every cent helps.

Truth is, I don’t know if some clubs really do that but it was imparted to me from a private source that it may have happened in the past. Particularly at one club.
[/quote]
Haha it wouldnt be my club doing that would it mate!! :wink:

So this is the updated Round 4 figure.

East Frem v Subiaco at East Frem 2,079
South Frem v West Perth at Fremantle 1,960
East Perth v Claremont at Medibank, Leederville 1,847
Swan Dist v Perth at Steel Blue, Bassendean 1,596

Club	        M	Home	Away	Best 	Total	Ave
Subiaco	        3	5441	2079	3406	7520	2507
East Perth	4	3536	5980	3406	9516	2379
East Frem	3	4297	2653	2653	6950	2317
West Perth	3	2574	3995	2574	6569	2190
Swan Dist	3	3968	2218	2372	6186	2062
South Frem	3	1960	3981	2278	5941	1980
Claremont	3	1703	4219	2372	5922	1974
Peel	        3	2653	3214	2653	5867	1956
Perth	        3	3803	1596	2278	5399	1800

So this is the updated Round 4 figure.

East Frem v Subiaco at East Frem 2,079
South Frem v West Perth at Fremantle 1,960
East Perth v Claremont at Medibank, Leederville 1,847
Swan Dist v Perth at Steel Blue, Bassendean 1,596

Club	        M	Home	Away	Best 	Total	Ave
Subiaco	        3	5441	2079	3406	7520	2507
East Perth	4	3536	5980	3406	9516	2379
East Frem	3	4297	2653	2653	6950	2317
West Perth	3	2574	3995	2574	6569	2190
Swan Dist	3	3968	2218	2372	6186	2062
South Frem	3	1960	3981	2278	5941	1980
Claremont	3	1703	4219	2372	5922	1974
Peel	        3	2653	3214	2653	5867	1956
Perth	        3	3803	1596	2278	5399	1800

[/quote]

My question/request is in Adam Gilchrists gloves I presume ?

My question/request is in Adam Gilchrists gloves I presume ?
[/quote]

Oh yeah, ok. Will give it a crack.

    Club   M	 Home	    Away	Best 	Total	Ave
Subiaco	   3	(2) 5441    2079 (1)	3406	7520	2507
East Perth 4	(2) 3536    5980 (2)	3406	9516	2379
East Frem  3	(2) 4297    2653 (1)	2653	6950	2317
West Perth 3	(1) 2574    3995 (2)	2574	6569	2190
Swan Dist  3	(2) 3968    2218 (1)	2372	6186	2062
South Frem 3	(1) 1960    3981 (2)	2278	5941	1980
Claremont  3	(1) 1703    4219 (2)	2372	5922	1974
Peel	   3	(1) 2653    3214 (2)	2653	5867	1956
Perth	   3	(2) 3803    1596 (1)	2278	5399	1800

Complete rubbish that there were only 1596 at Basso on Sat.

I don’t know why clubs deliberately down their numbers surly they have heard of the basic premises of marketing. Yes they may pocket a couple of $K but they loos out on much for than a couple of $K.

My question/request is in Adam Gilchrists gloves I presume ?
[/quote]

Oh yeah, ok. Will give it a crack.
[/quote]

Thanks…

No worries kirbs.

If you guys who attended the SD v P game really feel that the figure is very wrong, you should politely ask the SDFC if they’ve made an error. Nothing wrong with doing that.

Perhaps it’s a misprint and it’s meant to be 2,596 or something?

So this is the updated Round 4 figure.

East Frem v Subiaco at East Frem 2,079
South Frem v West Perth at Fremantle 1,960
East Perth v Claremont at Medibank, Leederville 1,847
Swan Dist v Perth at Steel Blue, Bassendean 1,596

Club	        M	Home	Away	Best 	Total	Ave
Subiaco	        3	5441	2079	3406	7520	2507
East Perth	4	3536	5980	3406	9516	2379
East Frem	3	4297	2653	2653	6950	2317
West Perth	3	2574	3995	2574	6569	2190
Swan Dist	3	3968	2218	2372	6186	2062
South Frem	3	1960	3981	2278	5941	1980
Claremont	3	1703	4219	2372	5922	1974
Peel	        3	2653	3214	2653	5867	1956
Perth	        3	3803	1596	2278	5399	1800

[/quote]

Yep a bit of bulldust there - I would think the Swans/Demon’s game would be the best attended not the worst ???

There is no way there was 2,000 at the Swans game, the figure looks about right to me

Ok - If you were there but it does seem odd as everytime Subi play the black ducks we’d get a bigger crowd than that figure - so henced I can’t work out why more supporters from both teams didn’t go when it was such a big game ???

No worries kirbs.

If you guys who attended the SD v P game really feel that the figure is very wrong, you should politely ask the SDFC if they’ve made an error. Nothing wrong with doing that.

Perhaps it’s a misprint and it’s meant to be 2,596 or something?
[/quote]

It certainly seemed closer to 2596 than 1596. As I have mentioned before La Hincha, these crowd numbers that are released are quite baffling. Anyway grateful to you for bothering to put them up.

There is no way there was 2,000 at the Swans game, the figure looks about right to me
[/quote]
Demon Strate there were probably 500 at the Colts game alone so are you saying to me there were only 1100 for the League??? :huh:
Over the full day my estimate would have been 2300 for SD v P!

There is no way there was 2,000 at the Swans game, the figure looks about right to me
[/quote]

Doesnt look like any of us can agree on these figures, one things for sure they seem odd at times, as far as the SF v WP game goes, our group estimated about 1800- 2000. Although one guy said about 1500, so maybe it it correct.

(n.b. DISCLAIMER: apologies to la hinch for having an opinion)

There is no way there was 2,000 at the Swans game, the figure looks about right to me
[/quote]
Demon Strate there were probably 500 at the Colts game alone so are you saying to me there were only 1100 for the League??? :huh:
Over the full day my estimate would have been 2300 for SD v P!
[/quote]

Interesting that you should say that. The same fixture last year drew 2,368.